Case study analysis from three different perspectives Essays

Case study analysis from three different perspectives Essays Case study analysis from three different perspectives Essay Case study analysis from three different perspectives Essay Case study analysis from three different perspectives Name Course Date Case study analysis from three different perspectives Ethics applies to all activities that are carried out by human beings. These are the principles that guide people in their professions. Different professions have established distinct but related ethical guidelines. The field of health is not exempted from moral and ethical standings. One of the major ethical debates is based on the issue of organ donation and the transplant process. In the case study, the doctor applies the procedural rule of first come first served. This essay provides a commentary to three perspectives on the ethical issues that arise from the procedural rule. 1. The first come first served rule should apply to all patients. In addition, the procedure should not take in to consideration the physical and financial aspect of the patient. In this case, the street person has greater chances of producing better health results than the lawyer. However, the street person has limited finances to cater for the follow-up process. The cost of treatment after the corneal transplant will require numerous procedures in order to reduce his vulnerability to other complications. However, the lawyer presents a valuable asset to society. He has a family he plays an important role in providing for his family. He is also less likely to incur further complications after surgery. In addition, the lawyer has the financial capability to cater for the follow-up process. He is also invaluable to society as he provides legal services to many people. This argument does not look into the character or potential of the street person. It is therefore unethical as the street person is discriminated based on the financial aspect. It is unethical for doctors to be bias based on prominence and wealth (Garret, et.al, 2009). The street child requires an equal and similar opportunity to the prominent lawyer. Though the lawyer has a family that relies on him, the street person is also a member of the same society as the lawyer. The lawyer may offer a viable option because of his status in society, but according to the law, everyone should have equal opportunities in the provision of healthcare whether rich or poor. 2. It is ethical for the doctor to use the first come first served rule. However, the doctor should consider the outcome of the procedure on both patients. The lawyer presents the possibility of better outcome compared to the street person. In addition, he does not have a history of illness and has fewer chances of complications after the transplant. However, this perspective should also consider the street person. Event though the lawyer presents better chances, the street person is also a patient that requires an organ. The outcome of the transplant should be taken into consideration, but the rule must apply equally either way. The street person also has the potential of benefiting society just like the lawyer. 3. This perspective differs with the rule of first come first served. The alcoholic patient presents fewer chances of following up on his treatment regimen. He also has numerous health complications that might plunge him into further health risks. The view of society is important in the medical field. However, this view should not contradict the ethical principles that guide the practice of medicine. The lawyer presents a better option as he makes a significant contribution to societal development. However, judging the alcoholic as an insignificant member of society is unethical. Alcoholics have the opportunity to change and live productive lives just like the lawyer. Patients should not be judged according to their character, as they deserve equal treatment and care. The physician is therefore correct in the procedural rule he employs. These two patients should pass through the transplant process based on their medical requirements. Therefore, the value of human life should be the p rimary consideration. References Garrett, T. M., Baillie, H. W., Garrett, R. M. (2009). Health care ethics: Principles and problems. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.

Themes Identified and Character Analysis in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein essays

Themes Identified and Character Analysis in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein essays Knowledge, social responsibility, society's view of beauty, and secrecy are major themes that occur in Mary Shelley's novel, Frankenstein. Shelley is able to identity some of the most hideous of human characteristics in her characters, focusing on how easily an obsession can become a blinding, dangerous force. Frankenstein and his monster represent the good and the bad that can come from the reckless pursuit of knowledge. Frankenstein's inability to accept his responsibility leads to endless suffering. This paper will examine how Shelley develops her characters throughout the novel and will also explore the important themes Shelley focuses on to make her We can clearly see how the theme of knowledge is intrinsically connected with scientific exploration in this story. This is significant because during the nineteenth century, many new scientific endeavors included the ability to "create artificial men and automations" (Johnson xiii). Additionally, favorite topics of the time included alchemy and galvanism. It is also important to note that Shelley adopted her father's belief that society was a corrupting force. (xiii) According to Martin Garrett, author of Mary Shelley, many conversations revolved around "the nature and the principle of life, and whether there was any probability of its ever being discovered or communicated . . . perhaps a corpse would be reanimated with the aid of electricity, or perhaps the components of parts of a creature might be manufactured, brought together, and endued with vital warmth" (Garrett 33). In addition to being a part of such lively conversations, Shelley had also read Sir Humphrey Davy's Discourse on Chemistry prior to penning her novel. Davy's notes conclude that chemistry grants man " powers . . . which have enabled him to modify and change the beings surrounding him, and by his experiments to interrogate nature with power, not simp...

The German Creation of Colonies in Africa and the British Expansion of Term Paper

The German Creation of Colonies in Africa and the British Expansion of Its Colonial Empire in India and South Asia - Term Paper Example Nevertheless, it was involved in hard campaigns against the countries it was trying to possess. The Chancellor of Germany of that period Otto von Bismarck was not interested in the colonial expansion, but under the influence of German society and leadership that claimed that Germany needed colonies to maintain its economic domination in Europe, he agreed to take this step. After the unification of Germany in 1871 it was obvious that this action should happen because the pressure was too great. The main groups that were lobbying for the colonial expansion were the West German Society for Colonization and Export (1881) and the Central Association for Commercial Geography and the Promotion of German Interests Abroad (1878). Bismarck thought that the future German colonies would be stabilizing power that will influence domestic politics of the country. The colonies were to emphasize nationalism and to raise the prestige and greatness of Germany on the international level. In 1884-1885 Ge rmany was the host of the international Berlin Conference, where European claims in Africa were sanctioned. The requirement was that the claims of possession in Africa must be manifested by the physical occupation of the territories. In 1873 African Society in Germany (Afrikanische Gesellschaft in Deutschland) was organized. The goal of the society was geographical exploration of Africa. In 1882 German Colonial Society (Deutscher Kolonialverein) appeared. More than 15000 supporters of the colonial politics united in this society. In 1887 it joined the Society for German Colonization (Gesellschaft fur Deutsche Kolonisation), which goal was the practical realization of the colonial plans.2 Desiring to strengthen his political position, and counting upon the support of the National Liberal Party at the elections to Reichstag in 1884, Bismarck announced that the German government will take under its guardianship all the international possessions of the German businessmen. Besides that, he thought that this action will weaken the flow of German emigrants to America and will direct this flow to the German colonies. During that period of time the following territories were moved under the protection of the German government: The land purchased by the Bremen businessman Adolf Luderitz at the territory of the modern Namibia. In April 1884 German Southwest Africa was formed here. The lands of Adolph Woermann – German Cameroon in July of 1884. German Togo in July of 1884 German East Africa (Tanzania) that previously belonged to Carl Peters and The Society for German Colonization, in February of 1885. Protectorate of Witu (modern Kenia) that belonged to brothers Denhardt. German New Guinea and Bismarck Archipelago In 1885 Bismarck abandoned the idea of the consistent colonial politics, and concentrated his efforts on the relationship with England and France. Colonies were used only as a bargaining chip in negotiations. At the Berlin Conference of 1884-1885 years, A frica was divided among the European powers, and according to Helgoland-Zanzibar agreement of 1890 African protectorate Witu was traded for the strategically important for Germany island of Helgoland in the North Sea. Under Wilhelm II Germany tried to enlarge the sphere of its colonial influence by increasing the number of commercial representatives.